Views: 100 Author: 深圳市博森威电气有限公司 Publish Time: 2026-08-27 Origin: BSUMWELL
This article covers the following content.
If you've already read the first three articles in this series, congratulations—you've mastered the core knowledge of corrosion protection selection. This article will help you put that knowledge into action:
Six Fatal Mistakes in Corrosion Protection Selection for Coastal and Chemical Projects
How to Avoid These Mistakes – A 3-Step Approach to Selection Decisions
Procurement Action Guide – Download Materials, Get Quotes, Request Samples
This article is by BSUMWELL Written by our technical team, we are a manufacturer and wholesaler specializing in waterproof electrical enclosures. Our products cover three major material series: stainless steel, aluminum, and PC/ABS plastic, with protection levels ranging from IP67 to IP68. We support OEM/ODM customization.
Error message: When purchasing IP67 housings, people only look at the waterproof rating and don't ask about the material's corrosion resistance.
Real consequences: After 2-3 years of operation in coastal environments, IP67 enclosures show signs of corrosion and perforation, leading to short circuits and burnout of internal components. (Based on ASTM B117 salt spray test accelerated model and industry-standard observation data from coastal projects)
Correct approach: IP67 addresses the question of "whether water can get in," but it doesn't address "whether the material will be corroded by salt spray." Coastal projects must confirm both the IP rating and the corrosion-resistant material.
Read the first article in this series, "The First Lesson in Corrosion Protection Selection".
Error message: If the coating of the aluminum casing is scratched during transportation or installation, it should not be repaired before installation.
Real consequences: Salt spray penetrates through the scratch, causing rapid pitting corrosion that spreads to surrounding areas. After 3-6 months, the coating peels off over a large area. (Based on industry-standard data on the pitting corrosion propagation rate of aluminum in a salt spray environment)
Correct approach: Before installation, check the integrity of the coating; scratches should be treated with special repair paint in time; marine-grade recoating should be used for environments above C3.
Error message: To save costs, 304 stainless steel was selected for projects within 2 kilometers of the coastline.
Real consequences: Tea stains appear after 2-3 years, and perforation occurs after 5-8 years. (Based on NACE data comparing the corrosion rates of 304 and 316 stainless steel in coastal environments)
Correct approach: For corrosion grades of C5 and above, 316 stainless steel (containing molybdenum, its resistance to chloride ion corrosion is far superior to 304) must be selected.
Error message: The outer casing is made of 316 stainless steel, but the fasteners, hinges, and latches are made of 304 or galvanized steel.
Real consequences: After 3-5 years, the screws rust and break, the hinges fall off, the door cannot be closed, and the entire enclosure becomes unusable—the outer shell remains intact, but the components fail first. (Based on industry-standard data on the electrochemical corrosion rates of different grades of stainless steel under salt spray conditions)
Correct approach: The entire system is made of 316 stainless steel – fasteners, hinges, latches, lugs, and cable glands are all 316.
Read the third article in this series, "From ISO 9223 to System-Level Corrosion Protection".
Error message: The chemical plant project selected a PC/ABS plastic enclosure, but the organic solvent vapors in the environment were not assessed.
Real consequences: Under the combined effects of installation stress and organic solvent vapor, plastic exhibits brittle cracking around screw holes without warning.
Correct approach: Confirm the PC/ABS material's resistance to organic solvents in the project environment; for environments with high concentrations of organic solvents, it is recommended to replace it with stainless steel.
Error message: The 316 stainless steel enclosure is mounted on an aluminum bracket without any intermediate partitions.
Real consequences: Electrochemical corrosion accelerates the corrosion of aluminum supports at the contact surfaces, causing "powdering" and loosening around screw holes, leading to tilting or even collapse of the enclosure. (Based on the principle of electrochemical corrosion, the potential difference between different metals in the electrolyte causes accelerated corrosion.)
Correct approach: Use insulating washers or insulating sleeves to isolate dissimilar metal contact surfaces; ensure that all exposed metal parts are made of the same material.
Read the third article in this series, "From ISO 9223 to System-Level Corrosion Protection".
Step 1: Confirm the corrosion level
Criteria for judgment: How far is the project from the coastline? Are there any chemical gases present?
Refer to ISO 9223 standards (see Part 3 of this series): C1-C2 / C3-C4 / C5-CX. If unsure, please contact the technical team for assistance in evaluation.
checkSee the full range of corrosion-resistant casing products
Step 2: Choose the right material
Match materials according to corrosion level:
C1-C3 → PC/ABS plastic (UV resistant)
C3-C4 → Aluminum casing (marine grade coating) or 304 stainless steel
C5-CX → 316 stainless steel
For a detailed comparison, please refer to the selection table in Part 2 of this series.
Step 3: Confirm system compatibility
Check three easily overlooked steps:
Are the materials of the fasteners/hinges/locks the same as those of the outer casing?
Is the material of the sealing strip suitable for the environment (silicone for coastal areas, FKM for chemical plants)?
Is there direct contact between dissimilar metals?
I suggest going through the checklist in the third article of this series.
Document Name | How to obtain |
Corrosion-resistant shell material selection comparison table | |
IP67/IP68 Protection Rating Description | |
Checklist for Corrosion Protection Selection in Coastal Projects |
Click to enter the download center
Please provide the following information when requesting a quote, and our sales team will typically provide an initial recommendation within 24 hours:
Project Types (Coastal Solar Power/Chemical Plant/Offshore/Other)
ISO 9223 corrosion rating (if known)
Estimated quantity
Material and protection level requirements
OEM/ODM customization required?
Target delivery date
Click to submit an inquiry (RFQ)
Standard models: Free samples (shipping costs not included)
Customized models: Project-based assessment
Summary of the key points of this article
6 common mistakes — IP67 ≠ corrosion resistance, damaged aluminum coating not treated, 304 stainless steel used in C5, 316 for the outer shell and 304 for the screws, plastic used in organic solvents, stainless steel and aluminum in direct contact.
3-Step Selection Decision — Confirm corrosion level → Select correct material → Confirm system compatibility.
Core Principles — The material is matched to the corrosion level, and the matching parts are simultaneously protected against corrosion.
A review of four articles in the anti-corrosion series
Article A: "The First Lesson in Anti-corrosion Selection: IP Rating Does Not Equal Anti-corrosion"—Understanding the Underlying Logic That IP ≠ Anti-corrosion Read the first article in this series
Article B: "Comparison of Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel, Aluminum, and PC/ABS Materials"—Real-world Performance and Applicable Scenarios of the Three Materials Read the second article in this series
Article C: From ISO 9223 Corrosion Grades to System-Level Corrosion Protection – Detailed Explanation of Corrosion Grades and System Matching Read the third article in this series
For support in selecting corrosion protection solutions tailored to specific projects, please contact our technical team. We can provide a free selection assessment based on ISO 9223 corrosion ratings and project requirements. Contact the technical team for a free selection assessment.
content is empty!


